~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Have a most blessed, not to mention fun, day~

Be SAFE!

Peace and good~

Moon

Ya gotta rant about your boss? Your spouse? Your family or friends? Or maybe you just want to bitch about the world at large? Vent here!

Ya gotta problem? A burden shared is half a burden!

Ya gotta a couple of giggles to share? Laughter is the best medicine!

TGIF is here and so are Musings Friday Follies!

Let it out on any subject and clean the slate for the wonderful weekend ahead!

(No subject is taboo if presented with decorum, except of course, the Gosselin kids and the “C” word. However, now that we have the word “Twaffle”, the “C” word doesn’t matter so much any longer now does it? )

ShareThis

VIDEO OF MICHAEL’S REHEARSAL:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedishrag/2009/07/rehearsal-footage-shows-an-active-dancing-michael-jackson.html

With the DEA joining forces with the medical examiner’s office to try and ascertain who had been providing Michael Jackson with the numerous drugs it is being reported he was allegedly being supplied with, including the dangerous drug Propofol (a potent drug used for surgical anesthesia), which was found at his home, who is at fault? Where does the onus lie? Squarely on Michael Jackson as any doctor, nurse, body guard or entourage in his employ was simply following orders from their employer, or are they (perhaps criminally) at fault as well for being enablers?

Regarding the children, apparently Debbie Rowe, the mother of Jackson’s two older children is surfacing and will, perhaps, move for custody of “her” children, even though she gave up her parental rights long ago and the children have no relationship with her whatsoever, not to mention she was left completely out of Michael’s will.

I am not a proponent of her receiving custody of the two older children, full stop, and I am certainly against breaking up the children in any way, shape or form. Because when the first two children were born she and Michael were married and are on the birth certificates as the mother and father (even though those children are not biologically Michael’s [duh!], do you feel she has right to those children? If she goes forward with the suit, do you feel that she will receive custody?

I do know that it would be my hope that those children will never be around Joe Jackson, and Michael’s mother, Katherine (who doesn’t presently live with Joe) is getting a bit too up in years to be mothering young children full time, IMO, but it is reported that she is close with her grandchildren and Michael clearly adored her.

She did not, however, protect any of her children from the physical beast known as Joe. Could Katherine be trusted to protect those “babies” from Joe?

Diana Ross was named in the will as a possible custodian of the children should Katherine not be alive or well enough to care for them, however Diana Ross is getting up there as well, at 64 years old, presently.

And what about the long time nanny? Should she just be expected to walk away should no one want to retain her services to continue in the care of the three Jackson heirs?

The aftermath of Michael’s death gets crazier by the minute and I am sure that there is much more to come, unfortunately.

Your thoughts?

http://preesi.lefora.com/forum/category/my-case-against-kate-gosselin/page1/

Thanks Preesi!

This seems to be the case, as least for now.

I have said numerous times on Musings that I would support almost anything that Kate Gosselin did for viable work as long as her kids were not involved in any way, shape or form, including using them or their images for marketing products, and I still feel that way, actually.

Although I have to say that the thought of designers, young or otherwise, that have actually gone to design school and paid their dues missing out on an opportunity to design in favor of Kate Gosselin, a person that doesn’t even, through her own admission, craft, doesn’t sit well. Perhaps an up an coming has gotten a well deserved break after all.

Anywho, Preesi has a number of screen shots that she has put together on her site which are interesting. Thanks Preesi (and all Musers, too)

http:
//preesi.lefora.com/2009/07/01/kates-healthtex-line-is-postponed/page1/

From Radaronline:

EXCLUSIVE: Kate Gosselin’s Clothing Project On HoldEXCLUSIVE: Kate Gosselin’s Clothing Project On Hold

As Kate Gosselin attempts to keep her family together as she and husband Jon sort through their divorce, her many side projects have been put on hold. The latest project to be affected by her private turmoil is a clothing project she was helping to promote as recent as May.

“Our project is on hold while she focuses on her family,” Healthtex representative Scott Pryzwansky confirmed to RadarOnline.com.

In an appearance on the Rachel Ray Show in May, Gosselin gave audience members a gift bag of treats including DVDs of Jon & Kate Plus 8, copies of her new book, and an adorable dress which Ray described as a “Healthtex outfit [Kate] helped design and create.”

While the fall clothing line is still available at Walmart, Gosselin’s involvement has come to a halt for the foreseeable future with no date for her return currently slated.

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/07/exclusive-kate-gosselin%E2%80%99s-clothing-project-hold

A link to this video was placed on Musings days ago but I didn’t even get to watch it until this evening.

It is awesomely awesome!

Interestingly enough I tried to get Web Boy to “star” in something similar a couple of months ago, but ultimately it was a “no go” from him.

No Christmas bonus for Web Boy this year; it is going to Dr. Coolsex, ’cause they rock!

Ya hear that Web Boy?!?

Ya HEAR?

As I stated a few times in various threads on Musings (Musings, with a singular s after the u and the g; plural for musing, meaning a product of contemplation or reflection) Matt Heckman skeeves me out. I did not know why exactly, other than my slimy vibe/BS meter went off the charts when I went to his site, all of the two times I could handle it.

Preesi posted a few reasons why I could be feeling the way I did, particularly since I could not find much about the guy online. As I stated previously, Matt Heckman seems to like to present himself (ineffectually I might add) as someone “in the know” regarding the State of Pennsylvania and tries to pass himself off as someone who is, perhaps, important in the state, politically or otherwise.

My intuition told me, and still does, that neither is true.

Apparently Matt Heckman had a wee bit of an issue with Preesi’s opinion, as evidenced below. My comments to Mr. Heckman are in bold. In addition, I will not be linking his site here. If one needs to go pay a visit, please Google his name and it will come up. As it stands, Musings comes up relatively quickly when one Googles his name which tells me as well that Mr. Heckman is just one more American citizen, hiding behind his computer screen, pretending to be important. Musings has a Google page rank of two, lol. If Musings from the Moon comes up early in a search for Mr. Heckman, I can guarantee that Mr. Heckman doesn’t have a hell of a lot going on as he is not listed on any major sites or sites of importance for the State of Pennsylvania as far as I can see.
_________________________________________________________________

Mussings from the Moon makes up a lie about Matt Heckman

Good LORD Mr. (word) Hackman Heckman, please, please, please try and proof your entries. Here is a little Word Press tip for you:  If there is a red line underneath a word that you have just typed, it is spelled incorrectly.  Now that is not going to help you with your homonym (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/homonym) issues however, but perhaps proofing more carefully will help you out along those lines.  The homonym that you seem to have the most trouble with is “weather” when you intended “whether”. Not only is it annoying to read it, in addition to your horrific misspellings, makes you sound dumber than a bag of rocks.

I try to keep neutral when I write my opinions about any subject weather people agree with me or not and I usually ignore comments about me as most of the time they’re so petty it’s not worth responding to people with the maturity of a 2 year old, however I just read a comment on Mussings from the the Moon where a poster by the name of Pressi made a very serious accusation against me that needs to be responded to. Here is the screen shot of the comment.

As far as I can ascertain, Preesi stated her opinion in response to a query I made regarding you. Now, being the educated man you are trying to pass yourself off as, I am sure that you are familiar with the First Amendment, yes?

Other than the fact that Pressi is a Ed Rendell supporter, and most likely a Democrat is not the issue, but to accuse me of threating the life of Dana Hoffman from The Reading Eagle is just way out of line. I have been critical of Dana as she promoted her readers at one point to conduct road rage against The Gosselins with a picture of their van when they first got it, and she continued to encourage her readers to stalk The Gosselins when they were still living in Wyomissing. I have also been critical of Dana on other issues, and even made some humorous jokes about her, however I never once threatened her life.

If Preesi being an Ed Rendell supporter or a Democrat is not at issue for you personally, then why the concerted effort to mention it, eh, Mr. Conservative? Further, I don’t live in PA so I don’t know the issues between you and Ms. Hoffman. Obviously those in the area would know more about this. Either way, I simply don’t care. As stated previously, this is Preesi’s opinion which has nothing to do with Musings from the Moon other than the fact that I am not a fan of censoring the Musings community or censorship in general, the liberal Democrat I am. That ol’ free speech thing again. If you have an issue with Preesi’s opinion, take it up with her. She has a site, go moan there (assuming you can spell her moniker correctly while you search for it).

We can agree or disagree with The Gosselins behavior, but to promate behavior that can endanger their kids when they did nothing wrong such as what Dana Hoffman and other bloggers have been doing back in those days, then you are crossing the line. I wrote about these incidents in the past and still stand by them today.

Again, neither I nor Musings is Preesi, nor do I or Musings care.

As for this blog Musings from the Moon, I will tell them right now they better retract this statement and issue an apology. I’m putting them on notice that they better get thier act together because I’m watching them, and if more outragous behavior such as this continues I will report it to all the necessary authorities. I can bet that Kate Gosselin’s staff watches Musings from the Moon for security purposes and her bodyguard has Musings from the Moon on their list of loony toon threats. As I read more into the Musings blog I discovered posts from people that have the potential of crossing that line, and Preesi is one of them.

The foregoing paragraph is as hilarious as it is preposterous. We obviously know you don’t read what you write as evidenced by all of the typos and misspellings that occur with every paragraph of your drivel, but may I suggest you start to read it? Then, and only then, may you start to realize how very ludicrous, not to mention irrational, you come across.

And here is a little FYI for you: While I have no doubt the Gosselin’s PR people read my blog, I can pretty much guarantee you that any security measures that the Gosselin’s enjoy are (besides for a sense of [false] self importance), for people such as your new blogging buddy “Debbie” a/k/a in the blogging world as “Baby Mama” and the Gosselins’ biggest (delusional) fan. People who do not like these child exploiting parents are not the ones outside of their home gawking and hoping for a peek of the family. They are not the people following them hither, thither and yon. They are not going to a Kate (full of lies) speech or standing, salivating in line for hours to pay full price for a book that Kate did not write just so they can say “Hi” to her, only for her to treat them like a piece of mouse turd in her cupboard. Those that speak out about Jon and Kate Gosselin are the least of their security worries, trust me.

I will be clear while I think The Gosselins are guily of fraud by scamming chruches by not only lying about their financial status as well as their personal life which is becoming more evident after reading their divorce papers, these kook blogs are just as guilty.

Spoken by a man who photoshopped swastikas on a picture of Kate Gosselin’s vehicle, with her standing beside it with her arm in the air, insinuating that she was Hitler.

NICE.

You want Jon & Kate Plus 8 taken off the air? That’s fine, but debate it in the arena of ideas, not by advocating driving by their home, stalking, and selling stories to tabloids.

You have the wrong blog, lol, try again.

If you claim to care about their kids then you would stop promoting actions that can be harmful to them. Instead of driving by The Gosselin house, drive by Harrisburg, lobby The General (dis)assembly to promote laws to better protect their privacy that you claim to support. I think the question you kooks need your ask yourself is what is more important to you your hatred for Kate Gosselin, or the safety of her children?

Have you read your own blog of late, lol, or looked at the pictures you create? Oh, that is correct, we have established that you don’t. Again, it would be my suggestion that you start, unless you want to keep embarrassing yourself even more so than you have thus far.

Until next time I rest my case.

Ditto.

Whether one wants to call it a aberration, caprice, characteristic, conceit, crotchet, eccentricity, equivocation, fancy, fetish, foible, habit, humor, idée fixe, idiosyncrasy, irregularity, kink, knack, mannerism, peculiarity, quibble, subterfuge, trait, turn, twist, vagary, whim, whimsy, or singularity, everyone has them!

What are yours?

Ya gotta rant about your boss? Your spouse? Your family or friends? Or maybe you just want to bitch about the world at large? Vent here!

Ya gotta problem? A burden shared is half a burden!

Ya gotta a couple of giggles to share? Laughter is the best medicine!

TGIF is here and so are Musings Friday Follies!

Let it out on any subject and clean the slate for the wonderful weekend ahead!

(No subject is taboo if presented with decorum, except of course, the Gosselin kids and the “C” word. However, now that we have the word “Twaffle”, the “C” word doesn’t matter so much any longer now does it? )

IT IS NOW CONFIRMED by CNN and HLN that Micheal HAS Died~ TMZ was correct when they reported it at 5:20 pm.

Godspeed, Michael!

TMZ must have jumped the gun as CNN and HLN are reporting he is now in a coma.

Original post:

FROM TMZ:

We’ve just learned Michael Jackson has died. He was 50.

Michael suffered a cardiac arrest earlier this afternoon at his Holmby Hills home and paramedics were unable to revive him. We’re told when paramedics arrived Jackson had no pulse and they never got a pulse back.

A source tells us Jackson was dead when paramedics arrived.

Once at the hospital, the staff tried to resuscitate him but he was completely unresponsive.

We’re told one of the staff members at Jackson’s home called 911.

La Toya ran in the hospital sobbing after Jackson was pronounced dead.

Michael is survived by three children: Michael Joseph Jackson, Jr., Paris Michael Katherine Jackson and Prince “Blanket” Michael Jackson II.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-dies-death-dead-cardiac-arrest/